An educational resource of the Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation

Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution
About Us Patient Information Medical Professionals Services

Low Vision | Our Medical Advisor | Member Guidelines | Ask Dr. Foster | Uveitis Glossary | Pars Planitis Forum | Contact Us

Home Page
    > Glenn's Rheumatology Reading Corner
        > SubQ Injection of MTX in Children with JIA who fail oral MTX
New Topic

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author
Comment
Webmaster
Administrator
(4/8/07 12:26 pm)


SubQ Injection of MTX in Children with JIA who fail oral MTX
Subject: [JRA] The Role of Subcutaneous Administration of MTX in Children w/JRA Who Have Failed Oral Methotrexate. (J Rheumatol 2004;31:179-82)

The Role of Subcutaneous Administration of Methotrexate in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Who Have Failed Oral Methotrexate www.jrheum.com/abstracts/...4/179.html

Khayriah Alsufyani, O. Ortiz-Alvarez, D. Cabral, L. Tucker, R. Petty, P. Malleson. From the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To describe the outcome of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treated with subcutaneous (Sc) methotrexate (MTX) after failing oral MTX (either because of inefficacy or toxicity) in a clinic population.

Methods: The study cohort was identified from our clinical database, and consisted of 61 children with JIA treated with MTX between 1988-2001. All patients fulfilled International League Against Rheumatism (ILAR) criteria for JIA and had disease duration of ³ 6 months and 3 or more active joints before institution of MTX. All patients had a score set of outcome variables assessed at baseline and at 3 months after achieving both maximum oral and SC MTX.

Outcome variables included physician global assessment of disease activity, number of active joints, number of joints with limited range of motion, duration of early morning stiffness, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

Improvement was defined as at least 30% improvement from baseline in 3 of 5 variables in the core set, with no more than one of the remaining variables worsening by more than 30%.

Results: A total of 61 patients, 43 females and 18 males with JIA were studied. The disease subtypes were systemic 8, polyarticular 25 (12 rheumatoid factor positive), oligoarticular 14, enthesitis related arthritis 5, and unclassified 4. Thirty-one patients were switched to SC MTX, 13 of whom had not improved, and 18 who had improved, but had nausea (11) or insufficient clinical improvement (7). After 3 months of SC MTX treatment, 76% of patients were classified as improved and 23% as not improved. Toxicity on SC MTX was less than on oral MTX.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that for patients failing oral MTX either because of inefficacy or toxicity, the use of SC MTX has a high likelihood of success with more than 70% of patients achieving clinically significant improvement, without clinically significant toxicity. (J Rheumatol 2004;31:179-82)

Reprint requests:
Dr. P. Malleson
Room K4-122
B.C.'s Children's Hospital
4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>


Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- Home Page - Glenn's Rheumatology Reading Corner - Ocular Immunology and Uveitis Foundation, URL>>www.uveitis.org -

Low Vision Instructions | About Our Medical Advisor | Uveitis  Glossary | Office Directions  |  Contact Us



Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2007 ezboard, Inc.