runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2079
(11/28/05 3:35 pm) Reply
mile and 2
since most ppl on this board are distance runners who will be the top guys in the mile and 2 mile? who will break 10? who will break 4:40? who will got to states?
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2080
(11/28/05 3:47 pm) Reply
mile and duece
Bobby Krause, Jimmy Joy, Justin Curtis, Justin Ellison, John Badaloto, Dan Renahan, Brendan Martin. All of which were 4:35 or under last year and under 10.
Miller could compete in the mile if he decides to go that high and if he can breathe.
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2081
(11/28/05 3:58 pm) Reply
I PREDICT
I'll be running a 4:34 Mile and 9:46 2 mile along with a 1:58 800 and i'll be going to states for the 4x800- all in spring track..
Guess who i am ...
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2085
(11/28/05 5:32 pm) Reply
...
andrew miller the crybaby
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2086
(11/28/05 5:35 pm) Reply
miller
running with asthma in the winter is extremely tough, any runner who runs winter track with asthma with all the wheezing has serious balls
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2087
(11/28/05 5:49 pm) Reply
ME
im going to win counties in the 3200
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2114
(11/30/05 3:32 am) Reply
10
kyle merber 10 hhhw will break 10 in the spring
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2117
(11/30/05 4:14 am) Reply
no he won't
no he won't
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2118
(11/30/05 6:55 am) Reply
i smell jealousy
i smell jealousy .
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2121
(11/30/05 3:27 pm) Reply
that kid might be right...
Even the 2 mile on the track requires a lot of leg speed, and considering, correct me if I'm wrong, Merber didn't go well below 5 or even below 5 in the mile last year for a single mile. So that would show that it is unlikely for him to be able to run two back to back sub-5 minute miles.
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2122
(11/30/05 3:35 pm) Reply
last year
last year means nothing, as most really good frosh dont have leg speed yet, and who knows if he focused on the mile
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2123
(11/30/05 3:47 pm) Reply
you have...
you have to break 5 in the mile before break 10 minutes in the 2 mile...and most people who break 10:30 in the 2 mile should be able to hit sub-5.
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2124
(11/30/05 4:15 pm) Reply
...
For MOST, not all, runners..it usually works out like...
2:10 half
4:48 mile
10:30 duece
2:06 half
4:38 mile
9:50-10:05 duece
Thats what it usually comes out to be, unless your a middle distance runner or just long distance guy, but for the most part that scale usually works
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2125
(11/30/05 4:19 pm) Reply
Re: ...
i disagree and that the 800 and mile can be compared and the mile and 2 mile as well but the 800- 2 mile is way to different
if u want to get sub 4:40 i think a 2:07 could get that and a 10 minute is about a 4:35-4:40 but just because some1 gets a 2:07 u cant assume that they can get a 10 minute
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2126
(11/30/05 5:32 pm) Reply
merber
"SHUT UP AND GO TO BED MERBER!!!!"
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2127
(11/30/05 5:33 pm) Reply
run alot
there's this book i'm reading by the cortland coach, and it gives VDOT values for times in popular races. a VDOT value is your psuedo vVO2 MAX. which is just a fancy way of saying how fast u go, when ur trying ur hardest. the VDOT chart that i read set these times equal in intensity.
*pertaining only to mid-distance runners
-pertaining only to distance runners
now it's not saying that if u run 4:30 than u can run 2:28:40 in the marathon. what it says is that these 2 runners would train at the same intensity, and differ in focus
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2131
(11/30/05 6:09 pm) Reply
joe
hey joe parks hows kristy longman doing
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2136
(11/30/05 7:53 pm) Reply
mile 2 mile
i ran 2:15 at suffolk west
4:42 at the armory
and 10:06 in the 3200 all within a few weeks of each other (the 800 wasnt fresh so maybe like a 2:13 at suffolk west)
Make them all at suffolk west and i was 215-4:45-10:06...those were all my times at suffolk west
i had no speed, i was a 60 second quarter miler and i think i was aobut a 2:13 and the other 2 were fast races
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2137
(12/1/05 3:40 am) Reply
Re: mile 2 mile
i figured out who u r
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2138
(12/1/05 9:32 am) Reply
figuring out
good stuff, just trying to help people get an idea of correlations between times
runalot Registered Member
Posts: 2140
(12/1/05 11:40 am) Reply
scale
the scale isnt the most accurate thing in the world, personally i ran nothing close to being on that scale, yes i was a "mid-distance" runner, but i was doing the same workouts as the distance runners on the team.
.
Email This To a Friend
Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies 
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies